|
TeleDUR is a major component of the TeleClaim
Drug Claims Processing system. It is the most advanced and comprehensive DUR system
available today. The TeleClaim system is a competitive leader because of the expanded
capabilities provided by this important DP/Rx product.
Before you learn why, let us
review the background that explains the broad acceptance of DUR techniques today.
Pharmaceuticals, when used properly, are cost- effective and help to reduce the need
for more expensive hospitalization and, in some instances, surgical intervention. They
also help to keep the elderly independent and out of nursing homes. Consequently, a
growing number of healthcare professionals have placed heavy emphasis on drug therapy as
the preferred option for patient care.
Drug Utilization Review ("DUR") was an outgrowth of this paradigm shift. Its
objective was, and is today, to enhance and improve therapeutic outcomes that are both
clinically appropriate and economically sound. DUR, in its broad application, can be both
prospective and retrospective with oversight and review of the dispensing process.
When a professional asks "Is it appropriate to prescribe this drug?", the
optimum answer is found in a fully informed assessment of multiple considerations
instantaneously available from DUR. A number of issues need to be considered and each
starts with the question: Is this drug,
- acceptable for the clinical situation?"
- the best drug? i. e. - the drug of choice, in the correct dose form, in the correct
strength, etc. for the clinical situation.
- the least expensive acceptable drug for the clinical situation?
- clinically appropriate but not reimbursable? (in other words, the drug is the best and
the least expensive, but the condition is cosmetic.)
- used excessively?
- significantly changing in its use with time?
Concurrent
DUR occurs before the medicine is dispensed to patients and involves a pharmacist's
review of a physician's prescription. The focus of Concurrent and Prospective
review is generally about potential adverse drug-to-drug/disease/age/pregnancy reactions,
refills to soon, under/over utilization, min/max dosages, duplicate therapy, and the need
for patient counseling.
Clearly, Concurrent DUR is vital to the dispensing pharmacist because it enables
early intervention for those rare instances of inappropriate prescribing. Healthcare
professionals depend on DUR because they want to identify those situations and prevent or
discourage them from recurring.
Retrospective
DUR involves evaluating pharmaceutical therapies after the
medications have been dispensed and consumed by the patient. Patterns of dispensing can be
analyzed. This capability is invaluable to the drug benefit sponsor's management. They are
continually evaluating the feasibility of plan adjustments for improving member
satisfaction while reducing costs.
DP/Rx's TeleDUR is an expanded DUR model of current systems and is thoroughly
integrated into the TeleClaim Drug Claims processor. The Concurrent DUR component
is incorporated into the on-line, real- time adjudication process and the Retrospective
DUR component is used in an off-line module of TeleClaim on an Ad Hoc or scheduled
basis.
TeleDUR
allows you to analyze drug use in three ways.
First, you define the circumstances under which it is inappropriate to use a given
drug. This control and compliance regimen is the cornerstone of the system.
For example, Premarin (estrogen) should not be dispensed to a male patient, The system
compares each prescription to the appropriate set of circumstances to determine whether or
not the order is acceptable. If not, the system transmits a message to the pharmacist
advising of the condition. This is part of the adjudication process.
Second,
the system aggregates individual drug records into user-defined groups as a
retrospective function. The reviewer can then see who is doing the most of something. For
example, you can tell which physicians are prescribing the most narcotics and to what
degree as shown below in Figure 1 .
|
HIGH/LOW CRITERIA SET REPORT |
| |
|
Controlled Substance by M.D. |
|
for Period 1-1-95 through 12-13-95 |
| |
| |
MD ID |
MD Name |
No. of Occurences |
| 1 |
5546 |
Forbush, J. |
2767 |
| 2 |
6675 |
Salezar, Jaime |
1866 |
| 3 |
8823 |
Butler, Byron |
1344 |
| 4 |
2367 |
Hammer, Michael |
1033 |
| 5 |
5534 |
Windemere, Glagys |
876 |
| 6 |
3429 |
Dunagan, Dudley |
555 |
| 7 |
9955 |
Niger, Adelaide |
522 |
| 8 |
7763 |
Fermi, Giacomo |
467 |
| 9 |
3256 |
Tatum, Frank |
402 |
| 10 |
1176 |
Kimble, Harry |
367 |
|
Third, the system includes a series of programs that let you
retrospectively track trends in usage. These programs enable you to compare the
prescribing, dispensing and/or consumption patterns of an individual (physician, pharmacy,
patient) or group with the other members of that group, or with itself over time. An
example would be an analysis of a recent period versus a comparable period in a previous
year of controlled substances of the top prescribing physicians, as shown in Figure 2.
|
COMPARATIVE TREND CRITERIA SET REPORT |
| |
|
Controlled Substance by M. D. |
|
Period No.1(1-1-96 thru 12-31-96) vs.
Period No.2(1-1-95 thru 12-31-95) |
| |
| |
Number of Rx Occurences |
| |
MD ID |
MD Name |
Period 1 |
Period 2 |
Difference |
| 1 |
5460 |
Forbush, J. |
2767 |
3123 |
-356 |
| 2 |
6675 |
Salezar, Jaime |
1866 |
1534 |
+332 |
| 3 |
8823 |
Butler, Byron |
1344 |
1477 |
-133 |
| 4 |
2367 |
Hammer, Michael |
1033 |
1299 |
-266 |
| 5 |
5534 |
Windemere, Glagys |
876 |
1087 |
-211 |
| 6 |
3429 |
Dunagan, Dudley |
555 |
766 |
-211 |
| 7 |
9955 |
Niger, Adelaide |
522 |
456 |
+66 |
| 8 |
7763 |
Fermi, Giacomo |
467 |
137 |
+330 |
| 9 |
3256 |
Tatum, Frank |
402 |
557 |
-155 |
| 10 |
1176 |
Kimble, Harry |
367 |
766 |
-399 |
|
All three
system functions, described above, are created and controlled by the user.
TeleDUR provides easy-to-use screen entry of the customizing parameters. Also, the system
imports commercially available data and parameters that contribute immensely to the
effectiveness Of TeleDUR.
Features and Functions
Some drugs are used only to treat a specific disease. Some are used only in combination
with other drugs and never by themselves . We give some drugs only to women and some only
to men. Some drugs we give for a specific time period and no longer. The list of criteria
that determine when a drug should be given is very long. Each drug has a unique collection
of circumstances that justify its use. We call these circumstances the Compliance Criteria
(aka: Absolute Criteria), and they embody a clinical judgment.
A Compliance Criteria set is the group of individual control and compliance
justifications for the use of a given drug,
After the clinician establishes the Compliance Criteria set for a particular
drug, the system compares a specific prescription to the set to see if it is justified.
This comparison can be performed at various times in the process. If we compare before the
prescription is written, then we call the DUR process Prospective. If we make the
comparison after the doctor writes the prescription but before the drug is dispensed, the
process is called Concurrent. If it is completed after the patient receives the
medication, it is Retrospective.
The TeleDUR user establishes these Compliance Criteria sets by data entry of the
defining parameters to the system. The example, given below in Figure 3. , is the first
screen, of two, for each set created. Each field location features "help"
inquiry on demand for a more detailed definition so the novice user is never lost or
stymied during entry.
| 05/29/1996
TeleDUR-COMPLIANCE CRITERIA SET(1)-MAINT. Release Date |
|
PRODUCT ID |
CODE |
SET NAME |
MONI ID |
SEQ |
| Change |
31200010000310 |
G |
Lanoxin vs. Coumadin |
001DPRX |
001 |
| |
| Lanoxin Tab |
| Active Range: 01011995
to 12311996 MMDDYYYY Updated:19960528 |
| DUR Code: DD Drug
Interaction Run FREQ:
Type: B Severity: |
| |
| DOSE
FORM/RTE:____/__
OVERUSE:0000____
UNDERUSE:0000____ |
| EXCESSIVE DAILY
DOSE/QTY/UNIT:___0000.000________/___ |
| INSUFFICIENT DAILY DOSE
QTY/UNIT:0000.000 |
| |
| DURATION OF THERAPY:
EXCESSIVE: 000
INSUFFICIENT:000 |
|
| |
| INDICATION CATEGORY: G (C)lass,
(D)rug Id; (G)eneric Id or (N)DC |
| INDICATIONS:
POS: |
|
CON:83200030200315 85150050100320
57100010000310 |
| |
|
COUMADIN TAB TICLID
TAB ALPAAZOLAM TAB |
|
The individual drug checking function has three components. First, you
create the sets themselves. TeleDUR allows you to define individual sets on-line or
multiple sets in batch, using the values from the commercially available databases
(i. e.
First DataBank or MediSpan). Second, you specify when the set gets checked (during the
order process or later in a retrospective mode.) Finally, you determine the type of
response the system returns if a circumstance in the Compliance Criteria set is met
(from a short warning message to pages of text called "monograms").
Although an individual instance of drug use may be acceptable,
sometimes we can ask other questions about overall drug usage. For example, "Is a
physician prescribing substantially more of a particular drug than other physicians? Is a
pharmacy dispensing more of a given brand than other pharmacies."
The function that allows you to make this comparison is the HighlLow
Criteria set. This function is the simplest. You read into the system a claims data
file that contains all the medication records for every patient, sort it, and write out a
report. An example was given earlier in Figure 1.
Creation of a HighlLow Criteria set is necessary for each analysis report. The
main menu of the system takes the user to a data entry screen that is similar to Figure 3.
Three screens are created by the user for any one set. The entry screens provided are for
(1) choosing the claims data to be selected in the process; (2) specifying how the
selected records are to be sorted; and (3) designating what portion of the selected
records you want printed. So, field by field the user defines and designs the report
desired.
For example, it may be desirable to review the most utilized generic
drugs during a specific time period. The following Figure 4, shows, in bar chart graphics,
those with the largest usage in ranked order. In this case, the selection was by class,
time period and designation of the number of records having the greatest quantities of
use.
Sometimes delivery of quality healthcare is not a black and white process. "Should
this drug be given now" is not the only question you can ask about usage. Changes in
patterns of prescribing and consumption are also of interest.
In the Comparative Trend Criteria set, you are looking at "trends" or
patterns of usage over time. There are two possible comparisons. First, how does the group
today compare to the group yesterday (for example, "Are there more or fewer class 2
prescriptions this year compared to last year?" as seen in Figure 2.).
Second, how
does the individual today compare to the individual yesterday (e. g. , "Has pharmacy
XYZ filled more or fewer class 2 prescriptions this year as compared to last year?").
The Comparative Trend Criteria set allows you to make these comparisons in the
simplest, most intuitive manner.
There are three screens to be completed for a Comparative Trend Criteria set.
First, you view a screen that lists all the data that comprise a patient medication order.
You choose those data elements that you want to track by typing a X next to them. The
second screen is used for specifying the sort order for the selected records. Finally, the
third screen is used to designate the date ranges to be compared and selection of a
limited number of line items (i.e. top 10%, bottom, etc.)
Detecting instances of inappropriate therapy is only the first step in modifying
physician behavior. You should also communicate with the physicians as the second step,
since it is the physicians' prescribing habits that need to be modified. TeleDUR provides
the preparation process for generating the letters with a word processor.
First, you determine which physicians get the communication. Then, the system generates
the letter file from the appropriate function. |